Monday, September 3, 2012

Hope is a universal language: the case for "illegal" immigrants in America

I have focused on feminist issues the past few weeks, largely because they have been dominating the media. Please remember that this site is dedicated to everyone's rights, not just those of women. Today I will discuss a group that is so vilified and scape-goated that most would quickly trade places with an American woman listening to the GOP debate which parts of her body she is intelligent/civilized/moral enough to control herself.

I am referring, of course, to "illegal" immigrants. Because the vitriol is not aimed at those rogue Canadians who have overstayed their travel visas by a few days, we are specifically talking about immigrants of Hispanic origin.

This is an issue on which 9/10 (or more) of you will completely disagree with me. I recognize that my view is considered radical, and I therefore understand that there may be some backlash to what I write. I feel it is absolutely critical, however, that someone (even just a small-time blogger like me) stands up for a group that most people write off as criminal and sub-human without even pausing to consider its circumstances.

Let me begin by saying that I do not really believe in "illegal" immigration and neither have our greatest leaders. The poem in the base of our Statue of Liberty proudly declares, "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!" This sentiment is the foundation of what it means to be an American. Our country was built upon the notion that all people (not just citizens) are entitled to "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness," as proclaimed by the Declaration of Independence. Further, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (the US was an author) clearly outlines the rights of people to live where they choose, including:
Article 13. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state. (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.
Article 14. (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. 
Article 15. (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality. (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.
Clearly it was not the intention of this great country to purposefully deny immigration rights to a specific group of people, yet that is what has happened. We can debate the basis for this discrimination all day--race, language, culture, educational attainment, etc. I argue, however, that the reason we focus our hatred on Hispanics is the same exact reason that we previously assigned it to the Irish, Italians, Polish, Chinese, Africans, and every other despised group in this country: money, or lack thereof.  Because while our political system may be democratic, our economic system (capitalism) is what really runs this country.

If you live in another country and you have wealth, power, or advanced education, you can come to the US. You can come here quite easily, without having to wait in line or jump through endless bureaucratic hoops. But what if you are one of those forgotten souls mentioned on our Statue of Liberty? What if you are one of the poor, the tired, the homeless, the oppressed? Unlike the rich and well-connected, you are told to take a ticket and find your place at the back of the line. We hope you brought your life savings for the visa charge and something to do because the wait could last a few decades.

Consider the lives of farm workers in this country. These are the people who harvest your produce. 85% are immigrants, most of whom are undocumented. Why? They work in brutal, slave-like conditions for 16+ hours per day, 6-7 days per week. They frequently make less than half minimum wage and they have no legal protections, no health care, and no job security. Yet this dehumanizing, destitute life is preferable to what they faced in their home countries. Take one second to truly process these circumstances: picking strawberries for a few dollars a day in the summer heat, without days off or medical care, is an upgrade for these people. They come from countries with rampant poverty and violence and no hope of upward mobility. So they do what anyone would do, and move to a place with education, the rule of law, and the opportunity to work to provide for their families.

This is the story of millions of people. They mow your lawn, pick your food, and clean your dishes at the local diner. They want what you want, what everyone wants--the opportunity to make their families' lives better. You gladly pay them to do your yard work twice as well as the teenager down the street and you complain when the price of strawberries rises above $4/pound. You then turn on the TV and nod along in agreement as Sean Hannity interviews Newt Gingrich on the damage done to our society by the "illegal" aliens. You vote Republican and decry the Dream Act. You call the local police when too many Spanish-speaking men are hanging around the Home Depot (after, of course, you pay a few of them $2/hour to come and paint your new deck). You treat this new group of immigrants the same way your Irish grandmother was treated nearly a century ago.

This is the most disgusting, un-American behavior I have seen in my 24 years on this earth.

What crime are these people committing by escaping hell in search of a better life? They are not asking for government handouts or a free ride. What would you do? Would you stay in a place where the lives of you and your children were threatened every day? No, you would not. If you claim otherwise, you are lying to yourself. And if you feel other people should bear such suffering rather than cross an invisible, man-made line in the ground without permission, you do not deserve the rights and privileges of this country that was created so that forgotten people like these would have a place to which they could escape. Remember what our Declaration of Independence says, what we wrote in the UDHR, what is inscribed in the Statue of Liberty. This country was founded on the principle of freedom, opportunity, and equality for all people.

Why do you and I deserve to live here, but not others? I did not earn my citizenship through a merit-based system, I simply won the genetic lottery. Who am I to face another human being and deny them the same protections and opportunities that I demand for myself?

That is the emotional, moral, humanitarian appeal. Here is the logical, fact-based argument for immigration. They not only have little to no impact on American wages and unemployment rates, they actually have a "net positive" effect on the US economy--increasing the average American's wealth by about 1% according to a Harvard economist. Numerous reports show that "certain businesses would not exist" without the immigrant labor force, and companies are "generating jobs that would not otherwise be there." Contrary to what most politicians and news pundits would have you believe, "most economists say that economic growth would be a half a percentage point to 2 points lower without immigrant workers."

When immigrants come here, they utilize the same goods and services as everyone else. They buy food, pay rent, and purchase clothing, all of which contribute to the growth of the economy. They are also net contributors to the government--when many undocumented workers share the same social security number, they all pay into the system yet reap no benefits for fear of getting caught. A White House report under President W. Bush found that the children of illegal immigrants "pay more in taxes than they consume in benefits."  It seems that every analysis comes to the same conclusion: immigrants are good for the economy.

Even so, we have spent $90 billion in the last decade to secure the US-Mexico border. Please note this figure only covers border security, not the cost of rooting out or deporting illegal immigrants. If we do not want these people to come here, we need to provide them with a viable alternative, preferably in their home countries. What if instead of shelling out money for failed border security, we invested that money in Mexico and Central America? What if we agreed to change our drug policies and offered financial support to the Mexican government to help them abolish the drug cartels? How many fewer people would cross the border if we helped build schools, roads, and hospitals in the countries from which immigrants come? What if we gave these people opportunities to succeed in their own countries, so they wouldn't have to become slaves in ours?

Ridiculous, most people would say. We are in a recession and can't afford to invest in Mexico instead of America. My response is that we have a choice. We can either provide a sustainable future for people where they already live, or we can allow them to come here to seek what they are currently denied. It is the human imperative to alleviate our suffering and attempt to better the lives of our families. People will continue to flow wherever such an opportunity exists, so we can create it in Central America and Mexico, or they will come here. This is an unavoidable truth, one that persists no matter how much money we dump into border patrols and fences.

Why then, is this never discussed by candidates in their stump speeches? Why doesn't Fox News report on this boon to the US economy? Why do we blindly push the failed policy of increased border security rather than solve the problem that pushes people into the US illegally? Because we need a boogey man. This country is in the midst of financial meltdown, social unrest, and record dissatisfaction with those who govern us. Like every civilization before us, we have found it easier to blame the dark-skinned stranger with a funny accent for all our problems than to look in the mirror and take responsibility for our failings. Hispanics who come here illegally are poor, disenfranchised people who cannot defend themselves from becoming our social, political, and economic prey. It is time we have an honest discussion about immigration in this country, based on facts and principles rather than jingoistic vitriol and beliefs divorced from reality. If you disagree, please don't just talk the talk, but walk the walk: stop buying commercial produce, eating at restaurants, and hiring a landscaping company. Don't build an addition onto your house or fix your car. In fact, drop off the grid entirely and see how well you get along by yourself, immigrant-free. I will see you in a few days, and will make sure to greet you appropriately. ¡Hola, amigo!

6 comments:

  1. thank you !

    As a stateless individual living in the USA with my basic human rights violated, I am very glad to read this !

    ReplyDelete
  2. Don't forget about all the poor girls and women who are so desperate to forge better lives for their families that they leave their poor communities when approached by "businessmen" promising them legitimate jobs in the US just to find themseleves victims of sex slave operations (if they're even "lucky" enough to make it that far without being killed by their pimps or abandoned mid-journey). They risk trusting these strange men for their promised "chance to live the American dream" because there is no other way for them to leave their countries legally for financial or other reasons mentioned above. It's sickening how many slaves we still have in this country and how several esteemed American men drive the demand for these women for their own sick pleasure.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The only options you give as a solution sound great in theory, but what about in practice? I agree with your point that our great Country was built by hard working immigrants, and that we should be accepting and willing to help the oppressed. That is the decent human thing to do. However, the reality is that we can't just open the gates here and say everyone is welcome. The world is a dangerous place where a lot of people hate us. The people who represent the Taliban in Afghanistan are oppressed and live in arguably more violent (with or without American occupation) and impoverished conditions than those from central America. Where does the line get drawn? Obviously you think homeland security is a waste or a failure, but I'd rather foot the bill to be vigilant in trying to protect the safety of American people.

    As for your plan of investing money in central America to keep citizens out of the USA, I can't tell whether you're being facetious or not. You spent a lot of time talking about and presenting facts about how these people boost our economy. So, your plan is to then spend money we don't have to help build the infrastructure in other counties so the people won't want or need to come to the USA any longer? I ask you this, where's the return on that investment? Not only would you be Stunting American economic growth by that .5-2% by keeping them out, but you spend money on schools for these people while urban areas across the country are shutting schools down? What about our citizens living in poverty?

    I don't want to come off as attacking you on this, but I believe you are looking at this situation with strictly a humanitarian point of view. As a fellow human being, I too would love nothing more than to create equal opportunity for everyone. However, I think I'm just too much of a realist to believe opening our gates for all oppressed people around the globe and/or financing other countries would actually solve any problem here. You say we have a choice, but to me the choices you gave me are 1: let terrorists have free reign to wreak havoc on innocent civilians or 2:make a fiscally irresponsible decision to spend money where there will be very little rate of return.

    I commend your righting ability and passion in your beliefs as you do make strong points. I just like playing devils advocate here and think I present logical questions to your solutions.

    Also, not really quite sure what the title of your blog is all about... What is "haz rights now", besides sounding grammatically ridiculous
    Look forward to reading more of your posts, but I do request you back off on inundating us with women's rights

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Holy shit...writing nit righting. Thought I made god points Until that made me sound like a complete moron! All ight before I question what your blog title means and attack it as grammatically ridiculous! Sorry!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. No worries, Mark. We all make typos, especially on our "smart" phones! To answer your questions:
    1. The name of the blog is a play on the lolcats trend (the cat pictures that say silly things like "i can haz cheezeburger?"). It is meant to highlight the utter craziness of having to ask for our basic rights in 2012 in America. It also comments on the infantilization of marginalized groups (especially women) and the "we know what is best for you" attitude of the government and society.
    2. I firmly believe in productive use of Homeland Security. We have an obligation to keep the country safe, but this cannot be at the price of human rights. This is a delicate balance and will never be perfectly achieved, but I think the Cheney/Bush era took us way too far to one side (i.e. the Patriot Act and the elimination of habeas corpus). I also think that we should deport immigrants who come here and commit serious crimes. I believe in equality of opportunity, not equality for equality's sake. The issue of who we allow to immigrate should not be limited by country of origin or wealth. Our refugee acceptance rate is deplorably low (will probably post on this at some point), and I think this must be addressed.
    3. I am not actually suggesting we invest in other countries instead of our own. I am saying that we have a choice. We, as a country, need to decide what we really want. Do we want immigrants here or don't we? If the answer is that we do not, then investing in their home countries is a far more effective and productive approach than building an electric fence. Also, addressing the poverty needs in this country is crucial to me. I would like to see a mass exodus in funding from destructive activities (like war) to constructive purposes, such as education and healthcare.
    4. Basically, we need to stop thinking about immigration from a hypothetical view and address the realities of the situation. I hear nothing but uninformed, reactionary rhetoric from politicians, the media, and most of our society. Let's discuss how things are and not how they "should" be.

    ReplyDelete